What is and what is not ReikiReiki Plain and Simple Ó A Comprehensive Guide to Usui Shiki Ryoho http://angelreiki.nu The Reiki Plain and Simple On-line Book, this site and all its contents are Copyright 1998-2001 Ó by Vincent Amador. The author of said material allows it to be used For Free Use only. It is to be shared freely, without cost. You may print copies of this work for personal use or to be shared with students, provided that it is given in its entirety, and this copyright message remains intact with the work. This material is not to be republished on other webservers, websites, translated, altered or in any other way used without the express written permission of the author. This notice supersedes any previous notices. All rights reserved. What "is" and what "is not" Reiki…… Welcome to the latest of articles fresh from the Reiki front…………. After reviewing literally thousands of websites and watching discussions on various message boards and e-lists I was motivated to write these words…….. As an aside, It is not my place to say what is reiki and what is not so the title of this Article is a bit ironic at best and misleading at worst. My goal here is to illustrate differing ideas regarding this issue, and to highlight what is essential to reiki practice from other techniques that have become part of current practice in some styles. Perhaps there is a bit of traditionalist in my heart after all….. I don't care if you invent "Fish Slapping Reiki" (ala Monty Python's Flying Circus "Fish Slapping Dance") and slap your clients with fish as you do reiki, I just care that you mention that it is not Usui Reiki. To some, this distinction might seem trivial, or even irrelevant. They may even ask what relevance does it have if people are dedicated healers. While I acknowledge that it is important to remember that our primary purpose is that of healers, I also understand that when I do Reiki I am representing my teachers, and their teachers back to Mikao Usui himself. I am representing this in my attitude and conduct and in how I present Reiki to the general public. If I am adding all sorts of things that Usui did not espouse, I believe it is my responsibility to label them as such. That is both honest and a courtesy to my clients and students. This is not to denigrate the practices of others. I am not commenting on the efficacy or appropriateness of practices added on to reiki, but trying to illustrate the difference and implore people to be honest about what they are and label them and what they are doing. With all the "new" styles, "new" symbols, and various other changes the question of exactly "what is" reiki becomes a legitimate question. To fully evaluate this question, I believe that we must examine reiki "the system" and reiki the "energy", new styles, traditional practice and newer modifications, channeled histories, and magickal add-on techniques. Reiki the "system" and Reiki the "energy" Most Masters do not differentiate between Reiki the "system" and Reiki the "energy" when talking about Reiki. Reiki the "energy" is the divine energy from the creator that is available to all creation on an equal basis that we use in the Reiki System for healing. Other systems such as Chi Gung, Seichim/SKHM, and others utilize this energy as well. Reiki, the universal life energy, is one name for the energy. When discussing Reiki the system, it would seem to be a different matter. Usui Reiki, or the Usui System of Natural Healing has certain characteristics. They would seem to be a series of principles, hand positions, symbols and attunements that are used in a fairly specific way. That is the "system" of Reiki. The question is, at what point does a change in the system become significant enough to constitute a change in Reiki "the system" to warrant somehow delineating it from other practices. For some practitioners, using distant attunements would constitute a change in the system. My views on this matter are listed in the Distant Attunement article on this site and so I will not bore the reader by repeating them here. Suffice it to say that I believe that distant attunements are a logical extension of the Distant Symbol and Distant healing that is part of the Usui System, and not a different system. When the Reiki Alliance attempted to trademark the word "Reiki", and "Usui System of Natural Healing", one of their stated reasons was to try to delineate what was and was not Usui Reiki. These days there are those that call themselves "Traditional" practitioners (there are numerous groups and individuals that use this designation, most with different practices), "non-traditional" practitioners, people like me who laughingly call what they do "neo-traditional" and newer Reiki’s such as Karuna ReikiÔ, Siddheartha ReikiÔ, Lightarian ReikiÔ, Tera Mai Reiki Ô, various Tibetan/Usui Mixes, and others. This moves our discussion into the next facet of "New Styles". New styles of Reiki We have seen that part of the confusion comes from there being a difference in the Reiki System and Reiki energy. Developers and advocates of the "new" reiki’s feel comfortable calling them a type of Reiki since they are also a "universal life energy". They are therefore referring to reiki "the energy", and not reiki "the system". The problem is that the public at large and even some reiki practitioners and masters do not understand this difference. There might be confusion that these are just another "type" of Usui Reiki. My own opinion, for whatever that is worth (which would be nothing, the same price you are paying for this manual!) is that people use the reiki "name" because it is widely known and the confusion between their product and Usui Reiki is desirable because it is gives the impression that it is reiki "the system". Some of the newer reiki’s, using the time honored advertising strategies of soap commercials and offer the "new and improved" model. I have seen websites selling training saying that Usui Reiki is a "lower frequency energy", while Seichim is "higher frequency energy", and Sekhem is the "highest frequency and unlimited in power". I have seen practitioners of Karuna ReikiÔ; make claims that it is "more powerful", "deeper working", and "higher frequency" than Usui Reiki. On some Lightarian ReikiÔ websites, I have seen it stated that Lightarian ReikiÔ is a higher band of energy than Karuna ReikiÔ thus establishing a continuum of power of energy systems with good old Vanilla type Usui Reiki at the bottom. By implication…… Usui Reiki is ok, but not as powerful and good as our brandÔ of Reiki. Usui Reiki must be the "KleenexÔ or XeroxÔ of the Energy System World, as it is the basis that all others are judged by. Indeed some teachers even promise satori experiences, and even enlightenment as one’s "light body" vibration is raised. Does anyone really believe that enlightenment is something you can put in a bottle, or receive an attunement, or just learn our system for $999.95 no ups and no extras and you will receive enlightenment? Do the words snake oil have any meaning to you………… But before we add to the confusion and hype and soap commercials atmosphere Two points must be made. First, I am not commenting on anyone’s practice of healing. There are so many dedicated healers who are committed to healing themselves, others and the world. If they find meaning in these practices then I wish them well and all the success in the world. However, when you make claims like those above you place yourself in a position of public scrutiny. People have a right to know if what you say is true. Let’s examine some of the statements that I have included above. First, can anyone establish that their energy is "higher frequency"? Answer: No, they cannot. They can through subjective perception of the energy but that is subject to perception and beliefs. There is simply no objective way to measure it. If you pay money for a class, and people all tell you that it is higher frequency and you feel it more strongly then your beliefs color your perception. How do we know that if you were just to commit to using Usui Reiki and practice heavily with it for the same amount of time as the class that you would not also notice the same feeling or increase. Additionally, you always feel the energy more strongly following any attunement process. Even as a reiki master, if you were to receive an additional Usui attunement you would feel it more strongly. (I should know, I have had about 57 of them.) Second, can anyone given you enlightenment from their energy system? Answer: No, they cannot. If you have to work to become enlightened using the Buddha’s teachings, Jesus' teachings and Mohammed's teachings, then I don’t think that there is a short cut. You can raise your lightbody’s vibration forever with attunements it is no shortcut for discarding the conditionings that cloud one’s mind and that is hard work. Third, the proof is in the pudding (so to speak). Can people with any of these "other™" reiki’s heal any better than any Usui Reiki practitioner? Answer: No, they cannot. At least, not from what I have seen. And short of controlled scientific studies there is no way they can substantiate these claims. Perhaps using anecdotal evidence might be acceptable if they could demonstrate a pattern of healing cases that other Reiki practitioners could not heal or something….. But fundamentally, if you are selling a healing system that is more deeply penetrating, higher frequency, etc., shouldn’t that translate somehow into better and faster healing? Traditional practice and new modifications Here is an area of some difficulty as there are many techniques that have found there way into Reiki practice that are not Usui Shiki Ryoho. Many people who learned Usui Reiki were interested in a variety of other things including Magick, Wicca, Mythical ancient civilizations, new age practices, crystals, and other things. People began experimenting with many of these and these "new" techniques eventually found their way into "Reiki". Some examples….. In distant healing (level II Reiki) Usui used a photograph, and Takata also taught to use a pillow or the thigh (teddy bear works nice too) it was the intent that the Reiki be sent that was essential. Some Masters added that while using a proxy to say, "by the ‘law of correspondence’ as I do reiki on this teddy bear it is done to this person". When you add "by the law of correspondence" you are placing in things from a Wiccan/Magickal tradition. Some Masters teach "Psychic Surgery" in their Advanced Reiki Classes. This involves a pseudo-hypnotic visualization technique along with energy manipulation techniques. Some advanced classes teach about charging crystals with reiki and giving them to clients, or making a crystal grid. While talismans and other charged objects have been part of Wicca, Strega, and other Magical systems for some time, they are not reiki. Manifestation grids seem to me to take their cue from some sort of spell work. Most of these things are commonly taught these days as some form of "Advanced" Reiki. Yet in reality, none of these are part of the Usui System, yet still classified under "Reiki". It gets confusing and perhaps really confusing to the consumer viewing all this from the outside. All I can comment on here, is that I do not use any of these practices. Now I am not commenting on the efficacy of these techniques. If you like them and use them and find them effective, then good I am happy for you. It is wonderful that you have these techniques available to you. The issue is that while an individual master may find that the additions are meaningful to them, they cannot demonstrate that they improve the Reiki or the healing. Reiki is a simple system. People will rise to whatever level of complications are needed for them. However, the question remains, are the additions Reiki. My answer: No, they are not part of the Reiki system, they are something else. Please if you are reading this and offending yourself by these words, understand that I am not saying inferior and not saying bad. I am saying, they are not necessary in the least to practice reiki. The last area I want to explore is the neo-channeled histories. Channeling has been around for a long time. People have practiced this form of divination throughout history. Some religious traditions have strict sanctions against it, while others do not. Whatever your personal beliefs regarding this phenomena the universal constants regarding channeling is that it is not a reliable practice, and it is dependent entirely upon the belief system of the practitioner. The belief system of the practitioner will influence more than anything else the message received. Bearing this information in mind let us look at some of the latest channeled information on "reiki" history. Lately I have seen Masters claiming that Reiki didn’t start with Usui but was much older than Usui. (.....is that Reiki the "energy" or Reiki the "system"?) One common myth where this is seen is that Reiki was "rediscovered" and is from Tibet. Channelers are telling us that Reiki came from Egypt, from the Mayans, from Atlantis, and even the Lemurians. Some believe it came from the "Ascendant Masters", while others think it came from the "Space Guys" (and some think the Ascendant Masters are the Space Guys!), and on and on and on. It has been my experience that there is nothing that will cause the general public's eyes to roll faster than saying, "Reiki comes from Lemuria 100,000 years ago, and the space guys taught the ascendant masters!!!!!!!!!!!" People then look at you with that "look", (you know the look, the one where they think you have forgotten to take your medication again and wondering if they should contact the authorities because you might be dangerous…) I have known people that received reiki and had the reiki heal a pain, injury or condition who later told me that it was "nonsense". Upon asking why, I found that their positive experience with reiki was undone by reading a book where they learned that Jesus learned Reiki from the Tibetans, or Jesus didn't die on the cross but went to India, or Reiki comes from the Ascended Masters, or the Space Guys, or Egyptian Goddesses, and they know this cause they read it in a published book by an "expert", and therefore Reiki must be pure nonsense. Personally I don't care if you believe that Fox Mulder is an Ascended Master reincarnated to get the Reiki Ray Gun back from the Aliens who introduced Reiki to humans way back on the Continent of Reikiania 4 million years ago so humanity can be saved. However, I have a problem when people represent that as being Reiki "the history" in Reiki "the system" because it is dishonest and makes it difficult to seriously present Reiki to the public and seriously damages the credibility of Reiki for those trying to use Reiki to heal others within the context of the general medical community. In Conclusion Well now that I have managed to irritate just about everyone in the Reiki community, and await angry Reiki practitioners to storm the gates of my email server, like angry peasants in a Frankenstein Movie storming the gates of the Castle Frankenstein, torches and pitchforks in hand………. Ok maybe it is not as bad as that, but people seem to take all of this so very seriously, with zeal generally reserved for religions. As Fox Mulder says, "The Truth is out there". Don't take what I say as gospel; investigate, keep an open mind, and find out for yourself. In all things remember that the hallmark of the Reiki system is that Reiki is Simple. That is what makes it great. It is the acknowledgement that we are limited and finite, but the source and creator is infinite. When our egos are in check and we let the universal love of the creator flow through us, wondrous things can happen. And you don't need angels, crystal talismans, crystal grids, channeled histories, psychic surgeries, and other complications to make it work, you just need to place your hands on someone, feel the love of Reiki, and let it flow. The rest will take care of itself. | AngelReiki Main Site | Reiki |